The room, one of the largest in the hotel, is packed tonight because the group will be electing a new executive board and because the group will hear a presentation from supporters of the upcoming local option sales tax ballot issue.
Currently the secretary is calling roll. We use to do this by sign-in sheets because it is so time consuming. However, some of the members wanted to be able to put names with faces. (Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, just a lengthy one.)
The elections are underway. Harvey Ross was nominated to serve as presiding officer for the elections. He declined the nomination and, in turn, nominated Roy Porterfield. No one else was nominated and Porterfield is now at the podium, making sure the group understands the election rules, the duties of the offices, etc.
Tonight the group will elect an executive body -- chair, 1st vice chair, 2nd vice chair, secretary, treasurer and financial secretary -- that will serve for two years. This is the first time since a bylaw change last summer that the group will be electing the executive board in an off year. (So, the executive board we elected at this time last year has served for only one year. All are running again except our current financial secretary Kay Hale.)
Nominations for Financial Secretary -- Ebony Luensman. No one else nominated --- she is elected.
Nominations for Treasurer -- DJ Arnold (incumbent). No one else nominated -- he is re-elected.
Nominations for Secretary -- Joe Stutler (incumbent); Joe Michalec. Michalec declines the nomination. Stutler is re-elected.
Nominations for 2nd Vice Chair -- Norm Sterzenbach (incumbent). No one else nominated -- he is re-elected.
Nominations for 1st Vice Chair -- Bret Nilles (incumbent). No one else nominated -- he is re-elected.
Nominations for Chair -- Diane Hoffmann (incumbent). No one else nominated -- she is re-elected.
So, there's the slate.
Sheriff Michael Gardner administers the oath of office to the newly elected officers.
"I'm humbled to be here -- standing re-elected as your chair," Hoffmann said. "I'm also humbled to be standing here as the leader of a group of people who do so many great things."
Hoffmann has run down her list of chairs for the various standing committees. (Yours truly will head the technology committee -- look out, Internets.)
Now we move on the boring business section of the meeting -- approval of minutes, executive officer reports, etc. You might want to check back in about 30 minutes if you are watching this for updates.
8:14 p.m. -- information from Gary Ficken, Vote Yes for Neighbors.
"Vote Yes is something very dear to my heart," Ficken said.
"We've waiting too long -- 8 months. We couldn't get the governor to call a special session... the federal response has been extremely slow."
Ficken compares the federal response in Cedar Rapids with that of the federal response to the disaster in Grand Forks.
"Inaction is worse than any other possible choice," he said.
Ficken said that federal and state legislators want to see "some skin in the game," that they want to see us helping ourselves. "The Cedar Rapids ballot is a 90-10 split. 90 percent of the money for all five years will go to flood-affected houses -- buyouts, rehabs and relocations, if needed."
"The City of Cedar Rapids has a huge bill to pay and that bill is not going to go away," Ficken says. The two choices are property taxes or sales taxes. By going with sales taxes, a portion of what is raised will come from outsiders. "It helps spread the burden."
Clark Rieke, a resident of Cedar Rapids, is now providing the opposing view.
Rieke said that he believes we will need to vote for this local option tax to prove to federal and state legislators that we are serious about recovery. He also wants Democrats to remember that our principals should put us against regressive taxes.
"The most appealing rationale for a sales tax is the ability of this tax to capture taxes from persons who do not live in Cedar Rapids," he said.
"Someone should estimate how much sales tax Cedar Rapids taxpayers pay for purchases outside of Cedar Rapids. ... What percent of these regional shoppers are low income?"
Rieke believes that although we might be backed against a wall with this tax, we should hold legislators' feet to the fire to demand more creative and less regressive solutions for any future concerns.
With both sides now being heard, Hoffmann is requesting the group either take action (pro or against) the Local Option Sales Tax, or elect to take no action. 1st Vice Chair Nilles made the motion that we endorse the tax.
Each person wishing to speak for or against the motion is being allowed one minute to make a statement regarding their wishes toward this endorsement.
"I believe this tax will help the community more than it will harm it," Nilles said.
Michelle Michalec, Affirmative Action chairwoman, speaks against. She does not believe the government will keep its promise to keep the moneys for what they say they will.
Mike Little, former campaign staffer, speaks for -- mostly regarding community pride and how we should care for one another.
Another woman -- sorry, but I don't know her name and she didn't identify herself -- says we should take into consideration community layoffs, and the challenges that are already being faced by members of the community.
Frank King, who represents the NW neighborhood, said he knows this is a regressive tax, but believes while it will impact the most poor, it will also largely benefit the poor.
Harvey Ross, speaking against, believes this body should not endorse or oppose such a measure.
Lynn Denables, a victim of the June flood, gives a very emotional push in favor of endorsement. She talks about those who are victims of the flood who continue to live in area hotels.
Slayton Thompson, who works with homeless families through the school district, wants to be sure that the tax money gets to those families who had homes previous to the flood. He said we need to allieviate the pressure on the flood victims -- especially those who are now paying rent and a mortgage.
Frank Reynolds, who says he made a pledge never to vote to tax himself again (not when so many others were willing to do it), says he likes the fact that this sunsets in 5 years.
Lloyd Hollachek agrees with Ross that this is not an issue that the body should endorse .
Hoffmann calls the question -- standing vote. The standing vote counts were very close, and there appears to be confusion as to the motion the floor. Given that, Hoffmann has re-stated the question to clarify for the group and we will now vote by ballot. Names and precinct numbers are required on the ballots because there is no such thing as a secret ballot in the Democratic Party.
As the vote counters collect and then begin counting the ballots, the body has moved on to old business. Off-Year Caucus is March 28 at 10 a.m. at the Marion Public Library.
Results of the ballot are in: the LCDCC will endorse the Local Option Sales Tax.
The remainder of the meeting will focus on new business, announcements and the like. It's unlikely anything will be of interest to readers, so I'm signing off.


