Several politicos are sending out their statements about Gen. David Petraeus' and Ambassador Ryan Crocker's testimonies before Congress today. Here's a listing of those I've received and I'll update with others when/if they arrive:
Rep. Bruce Braley, representing Iowa's 1st District:
"President Bush justified his 'surge' of 30,000 additional US troops into Iraq by saying it would give the Iraqi government a chance to achieve political reconciliation. Now, eight months later, our troops on the ground have done everything we've asked them to do, but the Iraqis aren't any closer to reaching political reconciliation than they were in January.
"Today, General Patraeus asked for more time for the President's plan. But how do we expect anything to change in Iraq if we continue the same old strategy?
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. All the troops and all the time in the world can't make the Iraqis reach a political solution for their country -- they have to do it themselves.
"It's time to show the Iraqis that we are serious about their taking control of their own country. I agree with the conclusion reached by the Iraq Study Group long ago: we need a timetable to redeploy our troops and turn Iraq over to the Iraqis."
Sen. Tom Harkin, representing Iowa:
"Today, General Petraeus once again came to Capitol Hill to ask Congress to prolong our involvement in Iraq's civil war. His assessment of the situation in Iraq was positive, but not independent. The simple fact is that asking General Petraeus to evaluate the surge he has overseen in Iraq is like asking a college student to grade his own term paper.
"In 2004, when General Petraeus was charged with training Iraqi security forces, he made a similar positive assessment of the situation in Iraq in a Washington Post op-ed. He said then that Iraqi forces were stepping forward, leading their country and that they showed a determination and desire to accept the full burden of security tasks for Iraq. That was nearly three long years ago, and we have come to find out differently. Most importantly, since the general's encouraging news in 2004, we have lost nearly 2,700 more American troops in this conflict.
"The Bush administration and Senate Republicans have continually asked the American people to wait until September to evaluate the effectiveness of the surge that began last January. Well, September has come and the situation in Iraq is the same: the Iraqi government has still failed to make progress towards reconciliation and our troops are still policing a civil war that requires a political, not a military, solution.
"Tomorrow will mark the sixth anniversary of September 11, a day on which barbarity and hatred came to our nation's shores and was met by heroism and bravery to make all Americans proud. This anniversary is a stark reminder of why we must combat terror as effectively as possible.
"The simple truth is that America cannot be as safe as it should be when our troops remain mired in a civil war in Iraq that has no foreseeable end. It is time to pursue a different strategy and redeploy our troops. It is unwise and it is immoral to ask our brave young men and women to continue putting their lives on the line when the Iraqi government cannot do the most basic work necessary to bring their country together.
"Evidence from the recently released GAO Report and the National Intelligence Estimate overwhelmingly show that the Iraqi government has failed to make political progress, the very thing which this latest surge was supposed to enable them to do. Our brave troops' professionalism, capability, and courage are unparalleled. However, our outstanding troops cannot end Iraq's civil war. Only Iraq's government can do that and they so far have refused to take the actions needed to do so.
"Congress must take the necessary steps to require the Bush Administration to redeploy our troops so that we can pursue a smarter campaign against the terrorists who threaten us."
Rep. Dave Loebsack, representing Iowa's 2nd District:
“I welcomed the opportunity to hear directly from General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker. They provided invaluable insight into the state of military operations and political progress in Iraq. I strongly believe the American people deserved to hear an honest assessment of the progress and challenges our military is experiencing.
“I have been working to change the way business is done in Washington, and ensure that Congress fulfills its oversight responsibilities. My amendment to the FY 2008 National Defense Authorization Act, which was passed by the House in May, would require this report be updated and resubmitted every six months so that Members of Congress and the American people are continually updated on the situation in Iraq.
“I have every confidence in the young men and women serving with honor and distinction in our nation’s military forces. However, the General and Ambassador made it clear that the Iraqi Government and regional leaders have shown little interest in or ability to reconcile their difference.
“I was disappointed to hear General Petraeus report that we will still have at least 130,000 troops on the ground next summer. Our troops have performed admirably, but no military strategy will create an environment where the Iraqi Government feels compelled to take responsibility for its nation’s future. Political reconciliation is necessary to create a stable civil society and political structure, and yet this goal seems painfully out of reach for the Iraqi Government.
“Four and a half years after the start of the war the President is still stubbornly pursuing a failed strategy. We can no longer afford to keep our combat troops on the ground while the Iraqi Government continues to make empty promises. We must immediately chart a new course in Iraq so we can begin to bring our troops home safely and responsibly.”
Sen. Chris Dodd, representing Connecticut and a Democratic presidential hopeful:
"The fact that there are questions about General Petraeus' report is not surprising given that it was brought to you by this White House. In contrast, independent report after report indicates that the whack-a-mole strategy has made this the bloodiest summer of the war. And by the General's admission, the so-called surge has not achieved its goal of political progress. But even more fundamentally, debating the merits of a tactic when the strategy that underlies it is failed is nothing more than a distraction from the work that needs to be done to bring this war to a close."
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Republican presidential hopeful:
“Today, General Petraeus provided the first look at a strategy that is getting results and an Iraq that is making progress.
“This is only the beginning, which is why we need to continue to listen to the assessment of General Petraeus and others on the ground so we can decide the best course of action going forward.
“The Democrats and MoveOn.org are doing a disservice to Iraq’s long-term future by jumping to political conclusions in advance of the General’s report. These times call for statesmen, not political rhetoric.”
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democratic presidential hopeful:
"I am saddened, but not surprised, by the recommendations of General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker on Iraq. I do not question the integrity or competence of these gentlemen, but the strategy George Bush and Dick Cheney have asked them to execute has failed. The course General Petraeus has recommended we take-- more of the same-- is unacceptable, irresponsible, and dangerous.
"Numerous independent reports confirm the obvious: we are not making real progress in Iraq. Our troops are dying and stuck in the middle of a civil war. The Iraqis will not take the necessary steps toward political reconciliation until we make it clear that we are leaving their country for good. Meanwhile, al-Qaeda has regrouped to its pre-9/11 strength. It is time we put the safety of our troops and the protection of our national interests before the legacy of Bush and Cheney.
"The only responsible option that remains is to get all of our troops out of Iraq as soon as possible. Only when all of our troops are out can the hard work of diplomacy begin.
"I have challenged the other major Democratic candidates to tell the American people how many troops they will leave in Iraq and for how long. The American people and I still are waiting for an answer. The other major candidates have suggested that they will leave some troops behind indefinitely. That idea does not make sense. What can a smaller force accomplish that a larger force could not? The other major candidates have gone so far as to suggest pulling out our combat troops and leaving tens of thousands of other troops behind. This policy would be gravely irresponsible. Why would we leave behind tens of thousands of unprotected troops?
"More and more experts are coming to the same conclusion that I arrived at months ago. Several defense experts, including former Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger and former Reagan defense official Lawrence Korb, have agreed publicly with my assessment that we can get all of our troops out quickly. During this war, we have rotated 240,000 troops in and out of Iraq in just three months-- I am confident that we can get 160,000 out safely within six to eight months. The only responsible option we have in Iraq is to get all of our troops out now."
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican presidential hopeful:
“Today’s testimony from General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker confirms the progress being made by our troops in Iraq. This is good news for Americans and Iraqis. The importance of a successful conclusion to Iraq must be weighed in light of the global threat of violent Jihad and terror. America must continue its commitment to the strategy General Petraeus is executing.
“Americans owe a debt of gratitude to General Petraeus, Ambassador Crocker, our troops and the diplomats who are risking their lives to make success and progress possible. The integrity of General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker were on display today. Now it is time for Senator Clinton, Senator Obama and Senator Edwards to display their own integrity by expressly disavowing the baseless attack on General Petraeus by MoveOn.org.”
Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, a Democratic presidential hopeful:
"I said over two weeks ago that General Petraeus needed to answer three questions in his report: Has the surge produced progress toward the political solution that's the only answer in Iraq? If not, when will it? And if the answer to these two questions is no, then what is the plan for our brave troops in Iraq? Last Friday, General Petraeus answered the first question when he wrote in a letter to the troops that his plan for the surge to produce political progress 'has not worked out as we had hoped.' Now, more than ever, we need answers to the other two questions.
"Congress must now decide whether they will serve the American people or simply follow the same Beltway mentality that has led to more inaction on Iraq. Even in the face of rising American causalities, greater civil unrest and no political progress, the Congress continues a false debate about whether President Bush should be granted more time. President Bush's Iraq strategy has failed, and Congress must not cave. Congress must support our troops by using every tool available to force the president to agree to a withdrawal.
"It's been reported that General Petraeus may propose the withdrawal of a single brigade by the end of the year in exchange for keeping the failed surge going another six months. This would not be the withdrawal the American people voted for. It would instead be another excuse for the administration to buy time until President Bush is out of office and can pass Iraq onto the next president.
"Congress must stand strong for the American people and tell the president: no timeline, no funding. No excuses."
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, a Republican presidential hopeful:
"I appreciate Gen. Petraeus' candid, compelling testimony before a joint House committee this afternoon, along with the insights of Ambassador Crocker. I look forward to their continued testimony tomorrow.
"I have deep respect and admiration for both of these outstanding men, who have staked their lives and reputations on a successful outcome in what, I believe, is the defining battle, not only of our time, but for Western civilization itself.
"From their testimony, it is clear that the surge is working; their military objectives are being met; and that a quick or precipitous withdrawal will have dire consequences, not only in terms of massive human suffering in Iraq – but for the region. Undoubtedly, Iran would be a winner in this scenario – rendering the whole world vulnerable. This scenario is unacceptable.
"General Petraeus stated that we cannot win in Iraq solely in Iraq and that we must continue to engage in a host of initiatives in neighboring countries, as well as cyberspace. I agree with Gen. Petraeus and believe a strong policy of engagement with countries in the region is critical.
"Gen. Petraeus testified that U.S and coalition forces have dealt a striking blow to Al Qaeda, in Iraq, which is a part of the larger international Al Qaeda network. On the eve of the sixth anniversary of the 9-11-01 terrorist attacks on America, we are reminded of this imperative: We must continue to wage an aggressive war on global terror to prevent future attacks.
"Both Gen. Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker have served our country with honor – and showed tremendous professionalism today. Winning this war is of utmost importance to America and our future – and we must get it right. I look forward to their continued analysis and recommendations."
Sen. Barack Obama, representing Illinois and a Democratic presidential hopeful:
"Changing the definition of success to stay the course with the wrong policy is the wrong course for our troops and our national security. The time to end the surge and to start bringing our troops home is now – not six months from now. The Iraqi government is not achieving the political progress that was the stated purpose of the surge, and in key areas has gone backwards. Our military cannot sustain its current deployments without crippling our ability to respond to contingencies around the world. It’s time for a change of direction that brings our troops home, applies real pressure on the Iraqis to act, surges our diplomacy, and addresses Iraq’s urgent humanitarian crisis. I can only support a policy that begins an immediate removal of our troops from Iraq’s civil war, and initiates a sustained drawdown of our military presence."
Rep. Dennis Kucinich, representing Ohio's 10th District and a Democratic presidential hopeful:
“This report to Congress represents a 4th quarter strategy to delay the inevitable. General Petraeus has been tasked with stalling Congress to keep the troops in the middle of a civil war.
“General Petraeus has failed to give Congress an independent assessment of the Iraq War. His statement sounds like the President’s talking points.
“Congress should not be mollified into accepting pre-surge troop levels. His talk of troop reductions is simply a dilatory tactic to mislead Congress. That is not progress, but a continuation of the failed strategy that has led us to our current predicament. The only worthy response is for Congress to demand the withdrawal of all troops.
“We do not have to fund the war. We must tell the President NO to any additional funding. No legislation is required. No vote is required. We have the money to bring the troops home. It does not require a vote. The only thing required is honesty, integrity and a willingness to end the war.”
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, representing California's 8th District and Speaker of the House:
“Last November, the American people voted for a New Direction in Iraq, but the President chose instead to escalate the war by reverting to a ‘surge’ strategy that had failed four times before. The President promised the American people that this surge would be a short-term effort to provide space for political reform and national reconciliation in Iraq. Today, despite overwhelming evidence that neither goal has been achieved, General Petraeus testified that the surge would last at least until next summer. This is simply unacceptable.
"At home, an overwhelming majority of Americans want us to responsibly redeploy our troops so we can begin to address the dire readiness state of our military and refocus on fighting terrorism around the world. Standing in the way is the stubborn refusal of President Bush to change course, regardless of the facts.
“The President’s strategy in Iraq has failed. It is time to change the mission of our troops to one that will promote regional stability and combat terrorism, so that the numbers of our brave men and women in uniform in Iraq can be reduced on a much more aggressive timetable than the one outlined today by General Petraeus.”
Rep. Roy Blunt, representing Missouri's 7th District and House Republican Whip:
“The testimony delivered this afternoon by Gen. Petraeus and Amb. Crocker was as sensible as it was straight-forward - an even-handed assessment informed by the facts as they exist on the ground, not the politics as they exist in Washington.
“These two honorable, eminently qualified public servants imparted on us today the importance of building on our current progress in Iraq, and avoiding the consequences that would be sure to follow a precipitous withdrawal of support forces from the region. In my view, we should fully and carefully weigh this testimony before rushing to legislative judgment - but we should also reflect on what was said here today and take its observations seriously.
“Not a single member of this institution wants to see our troops stay in Iraq one day longer than is necessary - and today General Petraeus made clear his intention to suggest a modest drawdown of troop levels in response to the successes he believes we have achieved in recent months. It’s a recommendation this president will likely take a close look at, and coming from a man of Gen. Petraeus’s caliber and experience - it’s one that deserves our serious consideration as well.
“Today’s testimony reminds us that our progress in Iraq has not come without a price. That’s why it remains more important than ever that Congress work together to craft a policy worthy of our troops’ continued sacrifice, and consistent with their single-minded determination to succeed.”
Sen. John Kerry, representing Massachusetts:
“It spoke volumes today when General Petraeus said the Iraqi politicians have been sitting on their thumbs while American soldiers sweated it out all summer. Nothing today suggested that President Bush’s eight months of escalation have done anything to achieve political progress in a deadly civil war. The three recent independent reports – from the General Accounting Office, the National Intelligence Estimate and the General Jones Commission - all say the opposite. I am looking forward to hearing from both of these public servants tomorrow during the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee hearing.”
Sen. Claire McCaskill, representing Missouri:
“When President Bush asked the American people in January to support a new way forward, he said this surge was going to be about giving the Iraqi people a chance to stabilize. He set forth himself in that speech in January nine benchmarks that he said he would hold the Iraqi government accountable for.
“Unfortunately, so far, we have not heard enough about why these benchmark aren’t being met, and why is it that we have been able to sacrifice as a country now on the ground for longer than our troops fought in World War II, why is it that the Iraq government cannot take meaningful steps towards securing their own country and living with each other.
“I think there is some good news in what General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker have said today – the fact that they acknowledge that drawing down troops is the right way to go.
“But unfortunately, I don’t think there has been enough conversation yet about something other than the two extremes. I don’t think any of us in Washington want an expeditious drawdown of all our troops in Iraq. And on the other hand, I don’t think most people in American want us to continue to stand in the middle of a civil war. I think there is something in between. I will look forward in the hearing tomorrow, I will look forward to questioning General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker, as I know many other senators will, about what would be in between.
“I think the logical thing is to change the mission, to change our mission from securing Iraq and providing stability to that nation to what we really should be doing which is fighting terrorism. We should be fighting terrorism in Iraq with our troops on the ground, but at a much lower level than we have now. And we should be refocusing our troops in other areas of the world where terrorism continues to be a problem, and in fact is growing because we are bogged down in Iraq. There is a better way than what we are doing now.
“I think that General Petraeus – although I think he is an honorable man, and I think both he and Ambassador Crocker are giving their best judgment – they own this strategy on behalf of the commander-in-chief, and they are obligated to defend it. I think there has to be somewhere in between the president’s stubborn opinion that nothing should change and the position of some on the left who believe everything has to change tomorrow. We’ve got to find that middle ground. It’s important to the American people, it’s important to the men and women risking their lives.”
Rep. Peter Welch, representing Vermont:
"Iraq is in the middle of a civil war that cannot be resolved by the United States military. The uneven progress reported by General Petraeus is tactical progress in service of what is the President's failed military policy. While our soldiers have bravely and characteristically done the job they have been asked to do, they cannot continue to referee a civil war or bring about the political and economic reforms necessary for stability in Iraq.
"Just last week the nonpartisan GAO reported that the Iraqi government has failed to deliver on nearly every benchmark of success put forth by President Bush. The Iraqi Parliament has not passed needed legislation to promote Sunni-Shiite reconciliation, Iraqi security forces remain dominated by sectarian militias, and reconstruction funds are still sitting idle in Iraqi bank accounts. Only in the Bush administration can a failing grade be considered a success.
"It is long past time to end this war and bring our troops home. Regrettably, the President continues to cling stubbornly to his failed policy and appears intent on running out the clock on his presidency rather than admitting the need for a change in course. Congress must use the power of the purse to force a change of policy and end this war."
Rep. Jay Inslee, representing Washington:
“Whether we leave in six weeks, six months or six more years, the result is going to be the same – a result decided by Iraqis. We’ve got to get over the Six-Month Syndrome – that if we just stay another six months with another 600 American soldiers dead, that somehow democracy suddenly will blossom in Iraq.
“We may have had a reduction in violence in some parts of Iraq, but we haven’t advanced in solving difference between Shiites and Sunnis in the last six months or five years. No amount of the administration’s smoke and mirrors can hide one fundamental fact: that there hasn’t been political reconciliation in Iraq, just a continuation of the president’s ruinous policies.
“No matter how effective our military is, it cannot solve the political problems in Iraq. The destiny of Iraq cannot be decided by American soldiers – it only can be determined by the Iraqi people and their leaders. Only Iraqis can forge political compromises necessary for long-term success. That’s why we need a timetable for redeployment in an orderly fashion.”
Sen. Richards Shelby, representing Alaska:
"The Congressional testimony today by General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker confirmed what I saw first-hand in Iraq last month - the surge appears to be working and our troops' morale remains high. However, we must remember there are limits to what our military can do and I remain deeply concerned about the Iraqis meeting their responsibility.
"I firmly believe the Iraqi government must do more to beef up its police force and military presence. In the near term, while I remain open to supporting a reduction of forces, I continue to believe it should be the military commanders and not 535 Members of Congress that should make that recommendation."
Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr., representing New Jersey:
“General Petraeus’ report to Congress was an utter disappointment. Rather than deliver a credible assessment of the situation in Iraq, General Petraeus donned the President’s rose-colored glasses to report a partisan perspective that runs contrary to this federal government’s own independent analysis of America’s military and political accomplishment in Iraq.
“The Petraeus report is just the latest smokescreen in this administration’s public relations campaign to distort the failed foreign policy it implemented to initiate and drive this war.
“The American people are tired of deception and gimmicky military maneuvers. As conditions in Iraq grow deadlier and more costly, we demand immediate relief for our troops. American casualties have grown fifty-six percent higher than in 2006. 264 U.S. troops were killed in July and August of 2007, marking the bloodiest summer since the start of the war. Tax payers continue to pay $3,816 per second to fund the war.
“But instead of addressing such troubling figures, the administration has the audacity to highlight an alliance our military has developed in the sparsely populated Anbar province--home to a mere five percent of the total population.
“Americans are not looking for reasons to keep our troops engaged in Iraq through the summer of 2008, as General Petraeus suggested. A majority of Americans are looking for strategic ways to immediately withdraw them. General Petraeus wasted a unique opportunity to reverse the course in Iraq and stem the deadly results of one of the worst foreign policy blunders in American history.
“We don’t need any more pyrrhic victories or photo opportunities. The mission has not been accomplished. It has only been complicated by the President’s wicked political considerations.”